ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½

ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½

12 November 2026

Related Information

ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ wins telehandler patent judgment

5 Jul 22 The High Court in London has found in favour of ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ over French competitor Manitou in a patent dispute relating to stability control systems on telehandlers.

A ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ Loadall telescopic handler
A ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ Loadall telescopic handler

The High Court of Justice (Patents Court) ruled that Manitou UK Limited and its listed French parent company Manitou BF, infringed ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½â€™s European Patent EP (GB) 2 616 382 for its Longitudinal Load Moment Control (LLMC) system, introduced in 2017.

The judgment was handed down today (5th July 2022) after a six-day hearing in the High Court of Justice (Patents Court) in London in November 2021.

The case will now be referred to a further hearing where ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ will be asking the High Court to grant an injunction to restrain further infringement. ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ will also be requesting an order for the assessment and payment of damages and costs with interest.

ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ has also brought infringement proceedings against Manitou BF, in France, for infringement of the same European Patent.  Those proceedings are still pending and a formal hearing is expected to take place in Paris sometime in the latter part of 2023.

The subject patent relates to ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½â€™s safety control system on its telehandler range, designed to give greater productivity and reach. The UK ruling found infringement by a significant number of Manitou's telehandler models depending on their date of release, including machines in its current product offering. Manitou unsuccessfully challenged the validity of the patent, which is due to expire in September 2031.

Related Information

ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ chief executive Graeme Macdonald said: “As I have said now on several occasions, ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ will not tolerate any infringement of its intellectual property rights in any jurisdiction, particularly when that involves its major competitors. ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ will always challenge any companies that seek to take unfair advantage of the very significant investments ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ undertakes in research and development to ensure it remains the leading manufacturer of telehandlers in the world.â€�

Manitou responded the next day with its own statement, saying: “Three of the [four] ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ patents considered at trial were found to be invalid in their entirety: European Patent EP 1 532 065 B2 (EP 065), its UK equivalent GB 2 390 595B (GB 595) and European Patent EP 2 263 965 B9 (EP 965). Consequently, all infringement claims brought by ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ against Manitou relating to these three patents failed completely.

“Moreover, the Court held that only certain features of telehandlers sold in the past infringed the fourth patent, European Patent EP 2 616 382 B3 (EP 382). While reserving the right to appeal this judgment, Manitou confirms it does not have a significant impact on its business in the UK, nor on the business of its customers.

“Manitou will in any event seek payment from ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ of all its costs relating to the claims pursued by ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ but rejected by the Court, as well as interest on those sums.

“As ever, the Manitou Group will continue to defend itself vigorously in the patent infringement litigation brought against it by ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½.â€�

MPU
MPU

Click here to view latest construction news »